The World Health Organization International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder
The World Health Organization International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/00000478-199812000-00001
复制
发表时间：
1998-12-01
影响因子：
5.6
通讯作者：
Mostofi, FK
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Epstein, JI;Amin, MB;Mostofi, FK
1997年10月，FK Mostofi博士在华盛顿特区的一次会议上召集了一群对膀胱肿瘤感兴趣的人。参与者包括泌尿病理学家、泌尿科医生、泌尿肿瘤学家和对膀胱肿瘤感兴趣的基础科学家。这次会议的目的是讨论膀胱术语，并向世界卫生组织（WHO）委员会提出关于尿路上皮肿瘤的建议。在这次会议之后，参加华盛顿会议的一组泌尿病理学家决定扩大该小组的代表性，并在1998年于马萨诸塞州波士顿举行的美国和加拿大病理学会会议上安排了一次主要由国际泌尿病理学家学会（ISUP）成员参加的会议。在这次会议上，有关膀胱病变，主要是肿瘤性和推定的癌前病变的术语的问题进行了讨论，导致共识声明。WHO/ISUP共识分类源于该共识会议委员会向WHO规划委员会提出的建议，以及他们对本文提出的几乎所有建议的同意。29.达成这种协商一致意见往往需要作出相当大的努力。许多参与这一进程的人都作出了妥协，以达成共识。目的是建立一个普遍接受的膀胱肿瘤分类系统，供病理学家、泌尿科医生和肿瘤学家有效使用。
In October 1997, Dr. FK Mostofi assembled a group of individuals interested in bladder neoplasia at a meeting in Washington DC. The participants included urologic pathologists, urologists, urologic oncologists, and basic scientists with an interest in bladder neoplasia. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss bladder terminology and make recommendations to the World Health Organization (WHO) Committee on urothelial tumors. Following this meeting, a group of the urologic pathologists who attended the Washington meeting decided to broaden the representation of the group and arranged a meeting primarily of the members of the International Society of Urologic Pathologists (ISUP) at the 1998 United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology Meeting held in Boston, Massachusetts. At this meeting, issues regarding terminology of bladder lesions, primarily neoplastic and putative preneoplastic lesions, were discussed, resulting in a consensus statement. The WHO/ISUP consensus classification arises from this consensus conference committee's recommendations to the WHO planning committee and their agreement with virtually all of the proposals presented herein. 29 The effort involved in reaching such a consensus was often considerable. Many of those involved in this process have compromised to arrive at a consensus. The aim was to develop a universally acceptable classification system for bladder neoplasia that could be used effectively by pathologists, urologists, and oncologists.†