Rater Reactions to Forced Distribution Rating Systems
Rater Reactions to Forced Distribution Rating Systems
复制标题
评级者对强制分配评级系统的反应
DOI：
10.1177/0149206307312514
复制
发表时间：
2009
影响因子：
13.5
通讯作者：
S. Green
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Deidra J. Schleicher;Rebecca Bull;S. Green
两项实验考察了评级者对强制分配评级系统 (FDRS) 的反应，尽管该系统在组织中很受欢迎，但在实证研究文献中很大程度上被忽视了。当 FDRS 用于行政目的以及被评估者表现的变异性降低时，评估者会报告更大的困难和更少的公平性。此外，人们发现 FDRS 比更传统的评级量表格式更困难且不太公平。最后，难度和公平性反应对于评估者对其向受评估者提供反馈的能力的信心以及他们未来使用该系统的自我效能具有重大影响。
Two experiments examined raters' reactions to a forced distribution rating system (FDRS), which, despite its popularity in organizations, has been largely ignored in the empirical research literature. Greater difficulty and less fairness were reported by raters when the FDRS was used for administrative purposes and when there was reduced variability in ratee performance. In addition, the FDRS was found to be more difficult and less fair than a more traditional rating scale format. Finally, difficulty and fairness reactions had significant implications for raters' confidence in their ability to provide feedback to the ratees and their self-efficacy for using the system going forward.