Steady-State Analysis of Light-harvesting Energy Transfer Driven by Incoherent Light: From Dimers to Networks.
Steady-State Analysis of Light-harvesting Energy Transfer Driven by Incoherent Light: From Dimers to Networks.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01648
复制
发表时间:
2020-07
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Pei-Yun Yang;Jianshu Cao
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pei-Yun Yang;Jianshu Cao
The question of how quantum coherence facilitates energy transfer has been intensively debated in the scientific community. Since natural and artificial light-harvesting units operate under the stationary condition, we address this question via a non-equilibrium steady-state analysis of a generic molecular dimer irradiated by incoherent sunlight and then generalize the key predictions to arbitrarily-complex exciton networks. The central result of the steady-state analysis is the coherence-flux-efficiency relation: η = c ∑i ≠ jFij κj = 2c ∑i ≠ jJij Im [ρij]κjwith c the normalization constant. In this relation, the first equality indicates that energy transfer efficiency $\eta$ is uniquely determined by the trapping flux, which is the product of flux F and branching ratio $\kappa$ for trapping at the reaction centers, and the second equality indicates that the energy transfer flux F is equivalent to quantum coherence measured by the imaginary part of the off-diagonal density matrix, i.e., $ Fij = 2Jij Im [ρij]. The coherence-flux-efficiency relation holds rigorously and generally for any exciton networks of arbitrary connectivity under the stationary condition and is not limited to incoherent radiation or incoherent pumping. For light-harvesting systems under incoherent light, non-equilibrium energy transfer flux (i.e. steady-state coherence) is driven by the breakdown of detailed balance and by the quantum interference of light-excitations and leads to the optimization of energy transfer efficiency. It should be noted that the steady-state coherence or, equivalently, the energy transfer flux is the combined result of light-induced transient coherence, inhomogeneous depletion, and system-bath correlation, and is thus not necessarily correlated with quantum beatings in 2D spectra. These findings are generally applicable to complex quantum networks and have implications for quantum optics and devices.