Handbook of Human Centric Visualization

Handbook of Human Centric Visualization
复制标题

以人为本的可视化手册

DOI:
10.1007/978-1-4614-7485-2_10
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Blandford A
Blandford A
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Blandford A

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

感觉制造研究的焦点往往集中在过程和资源上,如“图式”和“框架”。较少关注构成图式或框架的概念结构,或如何设计可视化来支持用户的概念结构。在本章中,我们介绍了一种基于概念结构收集用户需求的方法,当人们理解领域时,这些概念结构是人们工作的基础。我们从我们自己设计、原型和测试交互式可视化工具的经验中举例说明了这种方法,该工具用于理解学术文献以及律师和记者对耸人听闻的研究。我们将讨论如何从需求转移到设计,并对可视化进行分类,突出它们的主要概念结构基础。由于每个人都有他们自己的方式,所以包括使人们能够以他们自己的方式使用表示的功能是有益的;为此,专用工具是有帮助的。我们讨论了这些功能的设计。最后,我们提出了一种评估交互可视化的方法,从它们对感觉制造的支持来看,重点是用户和系统之间的匹配质量。
The focus of sensemaking research is often on process and resources such as “schemas” and “frames”. Less attention has been paid to the conceptual structures that make up the schema or frame, or how visualisations can be designed to support users’ conceptual structures. In this chapter, we present an approach to gathering user requirements based on the conceptual structures that people are working with when making sense of a domain. We illustrate the approach with examples drawn from our own experience of designing, prototyping and testing an interactive visualisation tool for making sense of academic literature and of studies of sensemaking by lawyers and journalists. We discuss how to move from requirements to design, drawing on a classification of visualisations that highlights their principal conceptual structuring basis. Since each individualmakes sensein their own way, it is beneficial to include features that enable people to work with a representation in their own way; for this, appropriation tools are helpful. We discuss the design of such features. Finally, we present an approach to evaluating interactive visualisations in terms of their support for sensemaking, focusing on the quality of the fit between users and system.