The International Health Regulations 10 years on: the governing framework for global health security.
The International Health Regulations 10 years on: the governing framework for global health security.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00948-4
复制
发表时间:
2015-11-28
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Friedman EA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gostin LO;DeBartolo MC;Friedman EA
Fundamental revisions to the International Health Regulations in 2005 were meant to herald a new era of global health security and cooperation. Yet, 10 years later, the International Health Regulations face criticism, particularly after the west African Ebola epidemic. Several high-level panels1 are reviewing the International Health Regulations’ functions and urging reforms. 2 The Global Health Security Agenda, a multilateral partnership focused on preventing, detecting, and responding to natural, accidental, or intentional disease outbreaks, has similar capacity building aims, but operates largely outside the International Health Regulations. 3, 4 Here, we review the International Health Regulations’ performance and future.The International Health Regulations5 is a legally binding instrument, which came into force in June, 2007, and now has 196 States Parties—every WHO member state plus Lichtenstein and the Holy See. 6 The scope of the International Health Regulations is “to prevent, protect against, control and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease”(article 2). The scope embraces an all-hazards strategy, covering health threats irrespective of their origin or source (article 1), which is distinct from the disease-specific model used in previous versions of the International Health Regulations. The intention was to incorporate biological, chemical, and radionuclear events. The International Health Regulations requires States Parties to develop core capacities for rapid detection and response, including for surveillance, laboratories, and risk communication—buttressed by legislation, financing, and national focal points. Core capacities embrace a public health strategy of strengthening local infrastructure and systems to detect, prevent, and contain outbreaks at their source before spreading internationally. States Parties agreed to “collaborate with each other” to develop and maintain core capacities. Furthermore, States Parties must promptly notify WHO of events that might constitute a public health emergency of international concern, with a continuing obligation to inform WHO of any updates. To guide notifications, annex 2 of the International Health Regulations contains a “decision instrument” to aid in assessing whether to notify WHO of a health event of potential international concern. Certain threats, such as smallpox, always require notification. For other threats, States Parties must use the instrument to establish whether they need to notify WHO. Departing from previous versions, the International Health Regulations authorises WHO to consider unofficial sources, such as scientists and the media. When it receives an unofficial