Mental Health Practice and Children
Mental Health Practice and Children
复制标题
心理健康实践和儿童
DOI：
10.1300/j200v02n02_12
复制
发表时间：
2004
影响因子：
1.1
通讯作者：
Barbara Fawcett
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Barbara Fawcett
摘要 在心理健康领域，争论沿着相反的方向展开，一个方向是保护公众，另一个方向是个人的公民权和人权。关于如何看待和应对精神困扰，意识形态和理论主导地位也存在相当大的争议。强调保护、控制和强迫以及权利、公民自治和自决的话语在应用于儿童和青少年时增加了动力。这也是一个在个人治疗方案以及政策和实践制定方面都被剥夺发言权的群体。本文讨论了关键的争论，并评估了改变政策和实践对英国遭受精神困扰的儿童和青少年的影响。尽管讨论是在特定的国家背景下进行的，但新兴主题与国际舞台上的辩论、政策和实践具有更广泛的相关性。
SUMMARY In the field of mental health, debates range along opposing axes with the protection of the public on one axis and the citizenship and human rights of the individual on the other. There is also considerable contestation for ideological and theoretical dominance about how mental distress should be viewed and responded to. Discourses alternatively emphasising protection, control and compulsion, and rights, citizenship autonomy and self-determination have added impetus when applied to children and young people. This is also a grouping denied a voice both in terms of individual treatment programmes and in the formulation of policy and practice. This article addresses the key debates and appraises the implications of changing policy and practice for children and young people experiencing mental distress in the UK. Although the discussion is located in a particular national context, the emergent themes have a much broader relevance for debates, policy and practice in the international arena.