‘Contractual’ and ‘cooperative’ civic engagement: The emergence and roles of ‘flood action groups’ in England and Wales
‘Contractual’ and ‘cooperative’ civic engagement: The emergence and roles of ‘flood action groups’ in England and Wales
复制标题
“契约”和“合作”公民参与：英格兰和威尔士“洪水行动团体”的出现和作用
DOI：
10.1007/s13280-014-0576-x
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
6.5
通讯作者：
E. Penning‐Rowsell
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Linda H. Geaves;E. Penning‐Rowsell
责任下放正在改变许多国家管理洪水风险的方式。评估英格兰洪水风险管理治理中新要素的出现和作用的研究探讨了过去十年中发展起来的众多“洪水行动小组”。我们确定了公众与当局之间的两大类关系。第一种表现出“契约”的特征：当局提供一定程度的保护，以换取税收或类似的支持。第二个体现了一种“协作”关系：公共知识，社会和财政资源是平等的，互补的权威，并寻求“集体安全”。一般来说，前者比后者更成功，但共同的经验教训是，成功的FRM不应被定义为纯粹的能力，以防止洪水，但在不同阶段的洪水风险管理的不同层次的社会获得各种资源的能力。
Devolution of responsibilities is transforming how flood risk is managed in many countries. Research assessing the emergence and role of a new element in the governance of flood risk management in England explored the numerous ‘flood action groups’ that have developed over the last decade. We identified two broad categories of relationship between the public and authorities. The first displays ‘contractual’ characteristics: a level of protection provided by the authority in exchange for taxes or similar support. The second embodies a ‘collaborative’ relationship: public knowledge, social and financial resources are equal and complementary to those of authority, and seeking ‘collective security’. In general, the former were more successful than the latter, but common lessons were that success in FRM should not be defined purely as the ability to prevent flooding, but as the ability to access a variety of resources across different levels of society at different stages of flood risk management.
DOI：
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.002
发表时间：
2011-02-01
影响因子：
8.9
作者：
Harries, Tim;Penning-Rowsell, Edmund
通讯作者：
Penning-Rowsell, Edmund