Nomenclature and taxonomy of the genus Salmonella
Nomenclature and taxonomy of the genus Salmonella
复制标题
DOI：
10.1099/ijs.0.63580-0
复制
发表时间：
2005-01-01
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
Euzéby, JP
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tindall, BJ;Grimont, PAD;Euzéby, JP
沙门氏菌属的命名已经达到了一个不令人满意的状态，有两种命名系统在流通。20世纪80年代由Le Minor和Popoff提出的一种系统得到了广泛的接受，尽管它不符合细菌学法规的规则。另一种系统符合《细菌学法典》的规定，被越来越少的少数人使用。由于最近提出了若干征求意见的请求，原核生物系统学国际委员会司法委员会发表了一项意见（第80号意见），旨在解决这些分歧。然而，与所有意见一样，它仅限于命名问题，无助于解释分类学后果。因此，司法委员会请术语和分类学领域的专家就第80号意见的术语和分类学后果撰写评论。本文解释了80号意见的命名结果，以及应用目前广泛接受的沙门氏菌属目前只包括两个物种的解释时所产生的分类学的明确介绍。
The nomenclature of the genus Salmonella has reached an unsatisfactory state of affairs, with two systems of nomenclature in circulation. One system, proposed in the 1980s by Le Minor and Popoff, has received wide acceptance, although it does not conform to the rules of the Bacteriological Code. The other system, which conforms to the rules of the Bacteriological Code, is being used by an ever-decreasing minority. As a result of a number of recent Requests for an Opinion, the Judicial Commission of the International Committee on the Systematics of Prokaryotes has issued an Opinion (Opinion 80) with the intention that it should solve these discrepancies. However, like all Opinions, it is limited to matters of nomenclature and does not help to interpret the taxonomic consequences. The Judicial Commission has therefore asked experts in the field of nomenclature and taxonomy to write a commentary on the nomenclatural and taxonomic consequences of Opinion 80. The present article explains the nomenclatural consequences of Opinion 80, together with a clear presentation of the taxonomy that results when applying the currently widely accepted interpretation that the genus Salmonella currently includes only two species.