On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching
On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching
复制标题
论学生教学评价的效度
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D. Mortelmans
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Spooren;Bert Brockx;D. Mortelmans
本文提供了一个广泛的概述，最近的文献对高等教育中的学生评教（SET）。该评论基于SET元验证模型，借鉴了自2000年以来在同行评审期刊上发表的研究报告。通过有效性的透镜，我们考虑了SET领域中更传统的研究主题（即，维度辩论，“偏见”问题和问卷设计）和SET研究的一些最新趋势，如在线SET和偏见调查额外的教师个人特征。该评论提供了一个清晰的想法，最先进的研究方面，对SET，从而使研究人员制定建议，为未来的研究。它认为，SET仍然是一个当前，但在高等教育，以及在教育研究微妙的话题。许多利害关系方不相信理工和技术对于形成和总结目的的有用性和有效性。关于SET的研究迄今未能对SET有效性的几个关键问题提供明确的答案。
This article provides an extensive overview of the recent literature on student evaluation of teaching (SET) in higher education. The review is based on the SET meta-validation model, drawing upon research reports published in peer-reviewed journals since 2000. Through the lens of validity, we consider both the more traditional research themes in the field of SET (i.e., the dimensionality debate, the ‘bias’ question, and questionnaire design) and some recent trends in SET research, such as online SET and bias investigations into additional teacher personal characteristics. The review provides a clear idea of the state of the art with regard to research on SET, thus allowing researchers to formulate suggestions for future research. It is argued that SET remains a current yet delicate topic in higher education, as well as in education research. Many stakeholders are not convinced of the usefulness and validity of SET for both formative and summative purposes. Research on SET has thus far failed to provide clear answers to several critical questions concerning the validity of SET.
DOI：
10.1080/10705510903008220
发表时间：
2009-01-01
影响因子：
6
作者：
Marsh, Herbert W.;Muthen, Bengt;Trautwein, Ulrich
通讯作者：
Trautwein, Ulrich