Proof-theoretic investigations into the Friedman-Sheard theories and other theories of truth
Proof-theoretic investigations into the Friedman-Sheard theories and other theories of truth
复制标题
对弗里德曼-谢尔德理论和其他真理理论的证明理论研究
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2010
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Graham Emil Leigh
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Graham Emil Leigh
This thesis is concerned with the analysis of theories of axiomatic truth. In [FS87], Friedman and Sheard define nine theories of truth. Each theory extends a weak base theory of truth by a maximal consistent subset of a collection of twelve principles of truth (referred to as Optional Axioms). The proof-theoretic strength of two of the nine theories has been determined by Cantini [Can90] and Halbach [Hal94]. We ascertain the proof-theoretic strength of the remaining seven Friedman-Sheard theories as well as many of their sub-theories yielding some possibly surprising results. The analysis of these theories utilises techniques of infinitary proof theory such as cut elimination and well-ordering proofs. We prove that the seven theories range from a conservative extension of PA to the strength of Σ1 dependent choice. Moreover, we show that most sets of Optional Axioms without the truthquantifier axioms form conservative extensions of PA when added to the base theory, and highlight the specific role some Optional Axioms play in determining the proof-theoretic strength. We then recast Friedman and Sheard’s programme in a purely intuitionistic setting, defining an intuitionistic base theory dispensing with both classical logic and a classical truth predicate and classifying all subsets of the Optional Axioms as either consistent or inconsistent over the new base theory. As a