Immediate judgments of learning are insensitive to implicit interference effects at retrieval
Immediate judgments of learning are insensitive to implicit interference effects at retrieval
复制标题
DOI：
10.3758/s13421-011-0138-4
复制
发表时间：
2012-01-01
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Hertzog, Christopher
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Eakin, Deborah K.;Hertzog, Christopher
我们进行了三个实验，以确定是否在编码，学习的即时判断（IJOLs）的元记忆预测是敏感的内隐干扰效应，将发生在检索。通过改变线索（实验1和2）或目标（实验3）的关联集大小来操纵内隐干扰。典型的发现是，记忆是大规模的设置大小的线索和目标，但只有当目标是单独研究，后来提示与相关的线索（extralist）。当两个对被放在一起研究时（内向型），无论集合大小，回忆都是一样的;集合大小的影响被消除了。提取时的元记忆预测，如延迟JOL（DJOL）和感知（FOK）判断准确地反映了内隐干扰效应（例如，Eakin & Hertzog，2006.在所有三个实验中，我们发现DJOL和FOK准确地预测了集合大小对检索的影响，但IJOL却没有。这些发现提供了进一步的证据，元记忆预测是从信息推断而不是直接访问记忆痕迹的状态，以及表明推断是基于不同的来源，这取决于何时在记忆过程中的预测。
We conducted three experiments to determine whether metamemory predictions at encoding, immediate judgments of learning (IJOLs) are sensitive to implicit interference effects that will occur at retrieval. Implicit interference was manipulated by varying the association set size of the cue (Experiments 1 and 2) or the target (Experiment 3). The typical finding is that memory is worse for large-set-size cues and targets, but only when the target is studied alone and later prompted with a related cue (extralist). When the pairs are studied together (intralist), recall is the same regardless of set size; set size effects are eliminated. Metamemory predictions at retrieval, such as delayed JOLs (DJOLs) and feeling-of-knowing (FOK) judgments accurately reflect implicit interference effects (e.g., Eakin & Hertzog, 2006. In all three experiments, we found that DJOLs and FOKs accurately predicted set size effects on retrieval but that IJOLs did not. The findings provide further evidence that metamemory predictions are inferred from information other than direct access to the state of the memory trace, as well as indicate that inferences are based on different sources depending on when in the memory process predictions are made.