Dichotomous "Good Outcome" Indicates Mobility More Than Cognitive or Social Quality of Life.
Dichotomous "Good Outcome" Indicates Mobility More Than Cognitive or Social Quality of Life.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1097/ccm.0000000000001082
复制
发表时间:
2015-08
影响因子:
8.8
通讯作者:
Cella D
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Naidech AM;Beaumont JL;Berman M;Francis B;Liotta E;Maas MB;Prabhakaran S;Holl J;Cella D
Worthwhile interventions for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) generally hinge on whether they improve the odds of “good outcome.” While good outcome is correlated with mobility, correlations with other domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), such as cognitive function (CF) and social functioning, are not well described. We tested the hypothesis that good outcome is more closely associated with mobility than other domains. We defined “good outcome” as 0 through 3 (independent ambulation or better) vs. 4 through 5 (dependent) on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at one, three and 12 months. We simultaneously assessed the mRS and HRQoL using web-based computer adaptive testing in the domains of mobility, CF (executive function and general concerns), and satisfaction with social roles and activities (SRA). We compared the area under the curve (AUC) between different HRQoL domains. Neurological intensive care unit with web-based follow-up We longitudinally followed 114 survivors with data at one month, 62 patients at three months, and 58 patients at 12 months. At one month, AUC was highest for mobility (0.957, 95% CI 0.904 – 0.98), higher than CF - general concerns (0.819, 95%CI 0.715-0.888, P=0.003 compared to mobility), satisfaction with SRA (0.85, 95%CI 0.753-0.911, P=0.01 compared to mobility) and CF - executive function (0.879, 95%CI 0.782-0.935, P=0.058 compared to mobility). Optimal specificity and sensitivity for ROC analysis were approximately 1.5 SD below the US population mean. HRQoL assessments reliably distinguished between good and poor outcome as determined by the mRS. “Good outcome” indicated HRQoL about 1.5 SD below the US population mean. Associations were weaker for CF and social function than mobility.