Measles, the media, and MMR: Impact of the 2014-15 measles outbreak
Measles, the media, and MMR: Impact of the 2014-15 measles outbreak
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.048
复制
发表时间：
2016-12-07
期刊：
影响因子：
5.5
通讯作者：
O'Leary, Sean T.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cataldi, Jessica R.;Dempsey, Amanda F.;O'Leary, Sean T.
Objective: In late 2014, a measles outbreak beginning in California received significant media attention. To better understand the impact of this outbreak, we conducted a survey to assess and compare among vaccine hesitant and non-hesitant new mothers how this outbreak affected vaccine knowledge, attitudes, vaccination plans, and media use.Methods: A cross-sectional email survey of English-speaking women with a child 41 year old using a convenience sample of women from nine obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) practices in Colorado assessed vaccine hesitancy, knowledge and attitudes about MMR vaccines and the outbreak, MMR vaccination plans before and after the outbreak, and use of and trust for media sources related to the outbreak.Results: The response rate was 50% (351/701). Knowledge about the outbreak was high and vaccination attitudes were mostly favorable. Forty-eight percent of respondents thought MMR vaccine was more important after the outbreak. Online news (76%), television news (75%), and social media (68%) were the most frequently used media sources, yet were highly trusted by only 18%, 22%, and 1% of respondents respectively. Government websites (34%) and information from a doctor's office (34%) were infrequently used, but were highly trusted by 62% and 60% of respondents. Knowledge of the outbreak was lower among vaccine-hesitant respondents. Few mothers changed MMR vaccination plans after the outbreak.Conclusions: New mothers had high levels of knowledge and favorable attitudes about vaccination after the 2014-15 measles outbreak. Media sources used the most are not the most trusted. Communication about outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases should include spread of accurate information to new media sources and strengthening of existing trust in traditional media. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
