How cross‐shareholding influences financial reporting: Evidence from Japan
How cross‐shareholding influences financial reporting: Evidence from Japan
复制标题
交叉持股如何影响财务报告:来自日本的证据
DOI:
10.1111/corg.12333
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Muramiya Katsuhiko and Takada Tomomi
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
小野慎一郎;椎葉淳;村宮克彦;石川博行;Oura Keisuke;井上定子;石川博行;村宮 克彦;橋本武久;Oura Keisuke;檜山純;飛鳥 由美子;石川博行;井上定子;高橋二朗;井上定子;檜山純;橋本武久;Oura Keisuke;Muramiya Katsuhiko and Takada Tomomi
Research Question/IssueThis study investigates the effect of cross‐shareholding on financial reporting and the information environment in the Japanese market and hypothesizes that higher cross‐shareholding is related to lower contract‐efficient earnings recognition and higher information asymmetry because cross‐shareholding entrenches managers. Furthermore, we investigate whether managers try to maximize their self‐interest or to enjoy a quiet life when they are isolated from market pressure and entrenched owing to cross‐shareholding.Research Findings/InsightsUsing a unique dataset on cross‐shareholding among Japanese listed firms, we find that higher cross‐shareholding is associated with (1) less timely loss recognition and (2) higher probability of information‐based trading. Further investigation clarifies that higher cross‐shareholdings are related to (3) lower absolute forecast error and (4) lower R&D expenditures. The first two findings indicate that cross‐shareholding entrenches managers, and the last two findings show that entrenched managers enjoy a quiet life.Theoretical/Academic ImplicationsThis study contributes to the corporate governance literature by providing new evidence that cross‐shareholding influences financial reporting and the information environment in the market by inducing managers to become entrenched and to enjoy a quiet life.Practitioner/Policy ImplicationsThis study provides implications for policymakers in markets in which cross‐shareholding is a common ownership format. To enhance contract‐efficient financial reporting and/or reduce information asymmetry in the market, it may be necessary to reduce cross‐shareholding.