Body schema and body image-Pros and cons
Body schema and body image-Pros and cons
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.022
复制
发表时间：
2010-02-01
期刊：
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
de Vignemont, Frederique
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
de Vignemont, Frederique
似乎没有什么身体意识的维度是不能被破坏的。为了解释这种多样性，越来越多的人认为至少有两种不同类型的身体表征会受到损害，身体图式和身体意象。然而，这些概念的定义往往不明确。身体意象的概念因缺乏统一的正面定义而备受争议。身体图式的概念似乎得到了更广泛的认同，它也涵盖了各种感觉运动表征。在这里，我提供了一个概念分析的身体图式对比它的身体意象（S），以及评估是否（i）身体图式可以具体受损，而其他类型的身体表征被保留;（ii）身体图式服从的原则是不同于那些适用于其他类型的身体表征。(C)2009爱思唯尔有限公司保留所有权利。
There seems to be no dimension of bodily awareness that cannot be disrupted. To account for such variety, there is a growing consensus that there are at least two distinct types of body representation that can be impaired, the body schema and the body image. However, the definition of these notions is often unclear. The notion of body image has attracted most controversy because of its lack of unifying positive definition. The notion of body schema, onto which there seems to be a more widespread agreement, also covers a variety of sensorimotor representations. Here, I provide a conceptual analysis of the body schema contrasting it with the body image(s) as well as assess whether (i) the body schema can be specifically impaired, while other types of body representation are preserved; and (ii) the body schema obeys principles that are different from those that apply to other types of body representation. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.