Commitment: the consistency of clinicians and the use of legal standards.
Commitment: the consistency of clinicians and the use of legal standards.
复制标题
承诺：临床医生和使用法律标准的一致性。
DOI：
10.1176/ajp.146.2.176
复制
发表时间：
1989
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Cleveland,S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lidz,CW;Mulvey,EP;Appelbaum,PS;Cleveland,S
承诺的法律的标准的应用的可靠性和有效性进行了调查，作为一个更大的研究的一部分。由96名不同的临床医生对411名患者进行的评估显示出良好的评价者间可靠性，用于评估忠诚度和可承诺性。一个强有力的关系之间的评级的承诺和评级的承诺表明，临床医生符合逻辑的承诺法。不一致的情况下，涉及自愿入院或其承诺是在其他地方完成的患者。结果表明，公平的应用承诺标准，但两个问题的法定解释困惑参与临床医生。
The reliability and validity of the application of legal criteria for commitment were investigated as part of a larger study. Evaluations of 411 patients by 96 different clinicians showed good interrater reliability for assessment of dangerousness and committability. A strong relationship between ratings of committability and ratings of dangerousness suggests that clinicians were conforming to the logic of the commitment law. Discrepant cases involved patients who desired voluntary admission or whose commitment was completed elsewhere. Results suggest fair application of commitment standards but that two issues of statutory interpretation confused participating clinicians.