Neither neural networks nor the language-of-thought alone make a complete game

Neither neural networks nor the language-of-thought alone make a complete game
复制标题

单独的神经网络和思维语言都不能构成完整的游戏

DOI:
10.1017/s0140525x23001954
复制
发表时间:
2023
影响因子:
29.3
通讯作者:
Hartshorne, Joshua K.
Hartshorne, Joshua K.
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Oved, Iris;Krishnaswamy, Nikhil;Pustejovsky, James;Hartshorne, Joshua K.

文献摘要

相似文献

认知科学从早期激进经验主义和激进本土主义的争论开始发展。最近深度神经网络(NN)模型的成功刺激了激进经验主义的复兴,作者对此做出了回应。我们同意类似语言的心理表征(思维语言)是最棒的游戏的一部分,但它们不能独立于其他玩家而被理解。
Cognitive science has evolved since early disputes between radical empiricism and radical nativism. The authors are reacting to the revival of radical empiricism spurred by recent successes in deep neural network (NN) models. We agree that language-like mental representations (language-of-thoughts [LoTs]) are part of the best game in town, but they cannot be understood independent of the other players.