Went for Cost, Stayed for Quality?: Moving the Back Office to India
Went for Cost, Stayed for Quality?: Moving the Back Office to India
复制标题
为了成本，为了质量？：将后台办公室搬到印度
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Kenney
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rafiq Dossani;M. Kenney
Went for Cost, Stayed for Quality?: Moving the Back Office to India August 7, 2003 Rafiq Dossani Senior Research Scholar Asia/Pacific Research Center Stanford University dossani@stanford.edu Martin Kenney Professor Department of Human and Community Development University of California, Davis Davis, California 95616 mfkenney@ucdavis.edu Senior Project Director Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy University of California, Berkeley * The authors thank Frank Mayadas and Alfred P. Sloan 基金会的 Gail Pesyna 支持我们的研究。他们感谢曼哈顿印度投资圆桌会议的参与者和 Harry Rowen 对早期版本的评论。感谢同意我们采访的 46 家公司的高管。 The authors also thank, in alphabetical order, the Maharastra Industrial Development Corporation, NASSCOM, and the Science and Technology Parks of India.没有他们的帮助，这项研究就不可能进行。作者对论文中表达的任何结论和意见承担全部责任。
Went for Cost, Stayed for Quality?: Moving the Back Office to India August 7, 2003 Rafiq Dossani Senior Research Scholar Asia/Pacific Research Center Stanford University dossani@stanford.edu Martin Kenney Professor Department of Human and Community Development University of California, Davis Davis, California 95616 mfkenney@ucdavis.edu Senior Project Director Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy University of California, Berkeley * The authors thank Frank Mayadas and Gail Pesyna of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation for supporting our research. They appreciate the comments by the participants of the Manhattan India Investment Roundtable and Harry Rowen on an earlier version. Thanks go to the executives of the forty-six firms that consented to our interviews. The authors also thank, in alphabetical order, the Maharastra Industrial Development Corporation, NASSCOM, and the Science and Technology Parks of India. Without their assistance, this research would not have been possible. The authors remain solely responsible for any conclusions and opinions expressed in the paper.