Construction Innovation
Construction Innovation
复制标题
建设创新
DOI：
10.1002/9781118655689.ch6
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Abbott C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Abbott C
欧洲大多数国家都制定了减少碳排放和提高能源效率的目标。在这些国家，微发电技术（MGT）的可再生能源是低碳议程的重要组成部分。人们对选择和采用这些技术的决策过程知之甚少，也不知道鼓励使用这些技术的特定政策工具的实际效果。在本章中，基于单个案例研究的简单说明被用来表明，由监管引发的创新，在这种情况下，采用MGT，往往会产生不能有效反映最终政策目标的结果。MGT的采用是通过利益表达和谈判的递归过程进行的。其结果-创新-可能最终成为一种妥协，只能部分满足利益攸关方的需要，但不能解决最终的政策目标。
Most countries in Europe have set targets to reduce carbon emissions and increase energy efficiency. In these countries, renewable energy from micro‐generation technology (MGT) is an important part of the low carbon agenda. Little is known about the decision‐making processes around the selection and adoption of such technologies, or about the actual effects of particular policy instruments encouraging their use. In this chapter, a simple illustration based on a single case study is used to show that innovation triggered by regulation, in this case the adoption of MGT, often has outcomes that do not reflect ultimate policy objectives in an effective way. The adoption of MGTs happens through a recursive process of interest articulation and negotiations. The outcome – the innovation – can end up being a compromise that only partially fulfil needs of stakeholders, but do not address ultimate policy objectives.