Short-term risk experience of involuntary resettled households in the Philippines and Indonesia
Short-term risk experience of involuntary resettled households in the Philippines and Indonesia
复制标题
菲律宾和印度尼西亚非自愿移民家庭的短期风险经历
DOI：
10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.07.013
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
6.8
通讯作者：
W. Vaart
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Navarra;A. Niehof;H. V. D. Horst;W. Vaart
非自愿重新安置往往使流离失所的家庭陷入贫困。Cernea认为，可以通过他的非自愿风险和重建模型（IRR）来避免贫困。IRR模型已广泛用于重新安置研究，并确定了流离失所固有的九个相互关联的潜在风险。尽管如此，在评估干预措施的风险和有效性时，大多数注意力都集中在体制方面。本文认为，减轻贫困风险的因素要广泛得多。它包括重新安置前一年和重新安置后一年。它调查了菲律宾和印度尼西亚非自愿重新安置事件所带来的八种风险的表现以及增加或减少这些风险的因素。对两种不同安置背景的研究结果显示了安置风险原因的多维性。研究进一步表明，制度背景本身不足以解释风险结果。在审查贫困风险时，应考虑文化、地理位置、个人和家庭特征。
Involuntary resettlement often impoverishes the displaced households. Cernea argued that impoverishment can be avoided with his Involuntary Risks and Reconstruction Model (IRR). The IRR Model has been widely utilized in resettlement studies and identifies nine interlinked potential risks inherent to displacement. Nonetheless, in assessing the risks as well as the effectiveness of interventions, most attention is directed at the institutional context. This paper argues that factors that mitigate risks of impoverishment are much more wide ranging. It covers the period of a year before and a year after resettlement. It investigates the manifestation of eight risks brought about by involuntary resettlement episodes in the Philippines and Indonesia as well as the factors that increased or decreased them. The findings in the study of two different resettlement contexts show the multi-dimensionality of resettlement risk causes. The study furthermore shows that institutional context alone is not enough to explain the risk outcome. Culture, physical location, individual and household characteristics should be factored in during the examination of impoverishment risks.