A novel structure-based multimode QSAR method affords predictive models for phosphodiesterase inhibitors.
A novel structure-based multimode QSAR method affords predictive models for phosphodiesterase inhibitors.
复制标题
一种新颖的基于结构的多模式 QSAR 方法为磷酸二酯酶抑制剂提供了预测模型。
DOI:
10.1021/ci900283j
复制
发表时间:
2010
影响因子:
5.6
通讯作者:
Zheng,Weifan
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dong,Xialan;Ebalunode,JerryO;Cho,SungJin;Zheng,Weifan
Quantitative structure−activity relationship (QSAR) methods aim to build quantitatively predictive models for the discovery of new molecules. It has been widely used in medicinal chemistry for drug discovery. Many QSAR techniques have been developed since Hansch’s seminal work, and more are still being developed. Motivated by Hopfinger’s receptor-dependent QSAR (RD-QSAR) formalism and the Lukacova−Balaz scheme to treat multimode issues, we have initiated studies that focus on a structure-based multimode QSAR (SBMM QSAR) method, where the structure of the target protein is used in characterizing the ligand, and the multimode issue of ligand binding is systematically treated with a modified Lukacova−Balaz scheme. All ligand molecules are first docked to the target binding pocket to obtain a set of aligned ligand poses. A structure-based pharmacophore concept is adopted to characterize the binding pocket. Specifically, we represent the binding pocket as a geometric grid labeled by pharmacophoric features. Each pose of the ligand is also represented as a labeled grid, where each grid point is labeled according to the atom types of nearby ligand atoms. These labeled grids or three-dimensional (3D) maps (both the receptor map (R-map) and the ligand map (L-map)) are compared to each other to derive descriptors for each pose of the ligand, resulting in a multimode structure−activity relationship (SAR) table. Iterative partial least-squares (PLS) is employed to build the QSAR models. When we applied this method to analyze PDE-4 inhibitors, predictive models have been developed, obtaining models with excellent training correlation (r2= 0.65−0.66), as well as test correlation (R2= 0.64−0.65). A comparative analysis with 4 other QSAR techniques demonstrates that this new method affords better models, in terms of the prediction power for the test set.