A perceptual evaluation of the speech of adventitiously deaf adult males.
A perceptual evaluation of the speech of adventitiously deaf adult males.
复制标题
对偶然失聪的成年男性言语的感知评估。
DOI：
10.1097/00003446-199006000-00001
复制
发表时间：
1990
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Jaclyn B. Spitzer
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Leder;Jaclyn B. Spitzer
本研究调查了偶然性耳聋对节段和超节段言语产生技能的知觉判断的影响。受试者包括 25 名偶然失聪的人和 10 名听力正常的成年男性说话者。 12 名科目被分类为可辅助的深刻 (AP)，13 名科目被分类为不可辅助的深刻 (UP)。每个受试者都由 15 名听众进行评判，首先根据 7 个言语和声音变量进行评判，其次根据他们是偶然性聋还是听力正常，以及如果偶然性聋，是否需要言语康复。 AP 和 UP 偶然性耳聋受试者在所有七个变量上都被判断为彼此之间以及与正常听力受试者之间存在显着差异。它们按层次顺序排列为：语调、音调、速率、鼻音、元音持续时间、发音和强度。 49% 的被确定为偶然性聋的说话者被认为需要进行听觉康复，特别是 26% 的 AP 说话者和 74% 的 UP 说话者。这一发现表明，在获得成人语音系统后出现严重听力损失后，听觉信息是维持准确言语和发声能力的必要组成部分。
The present study investigated the effects of adventitious deafness on perceptual judgments of segmental and suprasegmental speech production skills. Subjects were 25 adventitiously deaf and 10 normal-hearing adult male speakers. Twelve subjects were classified as aidable profound (AP) and 13 subjects were classified as unaidable profound (UP). Each subject was judged by 15 listeners, first on seven speech and voice variables and, second, on whether they were adventitiously deaf or normal-hearing and, if adventitiously deaf, if speech rehabilitation was warranted. Both the AP and UP adventitiously deaf subjects were judged significantly different from each other and from normal-hearing subjects on all seven variables. They were, in hierarchical order: intonation, pitch, rate, nasality, vowel duration, articulation, and intensity. Aural rehabilitation was judged to be warranted in 49% of the speakers identified as being adventitiously deaf, specifically 26% of the AP speakers and 74% of the UP speakers. This finding indicates that auditory information is a necessary component for maintaining accurate speech and voice production abilities following onset of profound hearing loss after the acquisition of an adult phonological system.