A theoretically informed meta-analysis of the risk for general and violent recidivism for mentally disordered offenders
A theoretically informed meta-analysis of the risk for general and violent recidivism for mentally disordered offenders
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.avb.2014.04.014
复制
发表时间：
2014-05-01
影响因子：
4.6
通讯作者：
Wilson, Holly A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bonta, James;Blais, Julie;Wilson, Holly A.
精神障碍罪犯（MDO）对负责以安全和人道的方式管理他们的法医和惩教人员构成了重大挑战。与非精神障碍罪犯一样，重要的是要确定预测累犯的因素，并可作为MDO的治疗目标。本荟萃分析从一般人格和认知社会学习（GPCSL）的角度和从临床角度采取的变量评估的相对预测有效性的风险/需要域。检索共得到126项研究，报告了96份独特样本（N = 23，900）。结果表明，所有的风险/需要域下的GPCSL的角度显着相关的一般和暴力累犯。相反，大多数临床变量（反社会人格/精神病除外）不能预测任何一种结果。这些发现强调了识别MDO的适当风险因素的重要性。皇冠版权所有（C）2014由爱思唯尔有限公司出版。保留所有权利。
Mentally disordered offenders (MDOs) pose a significant challenge for forensic and correctional staff charged with managing them in a safe and humane manner. As with non-disordered offenders, it is important to identify the factors that are predictive of recidivism and can serve as treatment targets for MDOs. The present meta-analysis evaluated the relative predictive validity of the risk/need domains from the General Personality and Cognitive Social Learning (GPCSL) perspective and variables taken from the clinical perspective. The search yielded a total of 126 studies reporting on 96 unique samples (N = 23,900). Results indicated that all risk/need domains under the GPCSL perspective were significantly related to both general and violent recidivism. In contrast, the majority of clinical variables (with the exception of antisocial personality/psychopathy) were not predictive of either outcome. These findings emphasize the importance of identifying appropriate risk factors for MDOs. Crown Copyright (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.