Implicit Trust in the Space of Reasons and Implications for Technology Design: A Response to Justine Pila
Implicit Trust in the Space of Reasons and Implications for Technology Design: A Response to Justine Pila
复制标题
对技术设计的原因和含义空间的隐含信任：对 Justine Pila 的回应
DOI：
10.1080/02691720902741423
复制
发表时间：
2009
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Carusi A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Carusi A
在这一期中，Pila批评了参与设计网格技术的需求工程师提出的建议，该技术用于支持Jirotka等人的乳房X光照片的分布式读取。。他们之间的分歧集中在“传记熟悉度”的概念上，以及这是否可以作为信任放射科医生等专业人士表现的可靠基础。在前两节中，本文解释了双方在这一分歧中的立场以及他们对分布式阅读技术设计的建议，第三节讨论了这种分歧的深层原因。有人认为，皮拉在试图为不信任和信任腾出空间时，把拥有和反思信任或不信任的理由的问题放在了首位。皮拉认为，熟悉传记并不是信任/不信任的充分理由，因为它似乎消除了不信任的可能性。针对她的建议，本文对传记熟悉度所涉及的信任形式进行了分析。特别是，隐含信任是重点--作为一种先于原因的信任形式，以及作为一种(在逻辑意义上)包含在其他原因中的信任形式。研究认为，内隐信任在建立一个主体间共享的世界中起着重要作用，在这个世界中，什么被认为是诸如X光读数之类的表现被接受的原因被建立起来。因此，隐性信任对于专业人士进入“理性空间”是必要的。坚持在缺乏在传记熟悉程度中发挥作用的隐性信任形式的情况下做出判断，就是要求放射科医生(和其他相关的类似专业人员)根据能够反思的理由来判断是否应该信任或不信任，但同时又让他们没有理由进行反思。
In this issue, Pila has criticised the recommendations made by requirements engineers involved in the design of a grid technology for the support of distributed readings of mammograms made by Jirotka et al. . The disagreement between them turns on the notion of “biographical familiarity” and whether it can be a sound basis for trust for the performances of professionals such as radiologists. In the first two sections, this paper gives an interpretation of the position of each side in this disagreement and their recommendation for the design of technology for distributed reading, and in the third the underlying reasons for this disagreement are discussed. It is argued that Pila, in attempting to make room for mistrust as well as trust, brings to the fore the question of having and reflecting upon reasons for trust or mistrust. Pila holds that biographical familiarity is not a sound reason for trust/mistrust, as it seems to obliterate the possibility of mistrust. In response to her proposal, an analysis is proposed of the forms of trust involved in biographical familiarity. In particular, implicit trust is focused upon—as a form of trust in advance of reasons, and as a form of trust contained (in the logical sense) within other reasons. It is proposed that implicit trust has an important role in establishing an intersubjectively shared world in which what counts as a reason for the acceptability of performances such as readings of X‐rays is established. Implicit trust, therefore, is necessary for professionals to enter into a “space of reasons”. To insist upon judgements made in the absence of the form of implicit trust at play in biographical familiarity is to demand that radiologists (and other relevantly similar professionals) make judgements regarding whether to trust or mistrust on the basis of reasons capable of being reflected upon, but at the same time leave them without reasons upon which to reflect.
登录
查看更多内容
在科学上信任他人：先验的还是经验的依据？
影响因子：
1
作者：
Elizabeth Fricker
通讯作者：
Elizabeth Fricker
信任的狡猾
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
P. Pettit
通讯作者：
P. Pettit
社群主义认识论的见证
影响因子：
1
作者：
M. Kusch
通讯作者：
M. Kusch
作者身份和电子科学：在数字环境中平衡认识论信任和怀疑论
影响因子：
1.7
作者：
J. Pila
通讯作者：
J. Pila
皮尔斯、查尔斯·桑德斯
影响因子：
4.8
作者：
J. L. Folks
通讯作者：
J. L. Folks