Life histories and the perspective of the present
Life histories and the perspective of the present
复制标题
DOI：
10.1075/ni.14.1.03jar
复制
发表时间：
2004-01-01
影响因子：
0.7
通讯作者：
J채rvinen, M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J채rvinen, M
本文的目的是建议叙事生活史传统沿着以乔治·赫伯特·米德和保罗·利科为代表的路线发展。这种理论方法是作为主观主义方法和结构主义方法的替代方案提出的，主观主义方法继续寻找生活历史背后的孤独、真实的自我，而结构主义方法则使自我及其过去的经验消失。在这篇文章中，一个理论框架是勾勒，a）侧重于“现在的角度”，但不忽视过去，和B）强调生活史的互动维度，但也注意到自我和它正在进行的项目。米德和利科的推理适用于一系列的经验性的例子，来自不同领域的生活史研究。
The purpose of the article is to suggest a development of the narrative life history tradition along the lines represented by George Herbert Mead and Paul Ricoeur. This theoretical approach is presented as an alternative to both subjectivist approaches, that continue the search for the solitary, true self behind the life histories, and to structuralist approaches, in which the self and its past experience disappears. In the article a theoretical framework is sketched that a) focuses on "the perspective of the present" but does not lose sight of the past, and b) emphasizes the interactionist dimensions of life histories but also pays attention to the self and its ongoing projects. The reasonings of Mead and Ricoeur are applied to a series of empirical examples, drawn from different areas of life history research.