The Future of Coding: A Comparison of Hand-Coding and Three Types of Computer-Assisted Text Analysis Methods
The Future of Coding: A Comparison of Hand-Coding and Three Types of Computer-Assisted Text Analysis Methods
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0049124118769114
复制
发表时间：
2021-02-01
影响因子：
6.3
通讯作者：
McCall, Leslie
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nelson, Laura K.;Burk, Derek;McCall, Leslie
Advances in computer science and computational linguistics have yielded new, and faster, computational approaches to structuring and analyzing textual data. These approaches perform well on tasks like information extraction, but their ability to identify complex, socially constructed, and unsettled theoretical concepts-a central goal of sociological content analysis-has not been tested. To fill this gap, we compare the results produced by three common computer-assisted approaches-dictionary, supervised machine learning (SML), and unsupervised machine learning-to those produced through a rigorous hand-coding analysis of inequality in the news (N = 1,253 articles). Although we find that SML methods perform best in replicating hand-coded results, we document and clarify the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, including how they can complement one another. We argue that content analysts in the social sciences would do well to keep all these approaches in their toolkit, deploying them purposefully according to the task at hand.
