Public and self-organized land readjustment in rural China - A comparison
Public and self-organized land readjustment in rural China - A comparison
复制标题
中国农村公共土地整理与自发组织土地整理——比较
DOI：
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.04.006
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
5.1
通讯作者：
Heerink Nico
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tan Rong;Heerink Nico
土地整理在城乡发展中的作用越来越受到世界各国的重视。然而，关于如何最有效地组织土地调整的研究仍处于初级阶段。本文首先建立了一个基于交易成本经济学的土地整理组织模式比较框架。然后介绍并比较了中国近年来发展起来的两种不同的土地整理模式，即公共模式和自组织模式。本文以浙江省和四川省为例，论证了土地整理交易属性与土地整理方式的不匹配对土地整理绩效的影响。研究结果可为进一步的土地整理研究和政策制定提供参考。
The role of land readjustment for urban and rural development has attracted more and more attention worldwide. Research on how land readjustment can be organized most effectively, however, is still in its infancy. This paper firstly develops a framework for comparing different organization modes of land readjustment based on transaction cost economics. It then introduces and compares two different modes of land readjustment that have recently been developed in China, i.e., a public mode and a self-organized mode. We argue, and provide evidence from two case studies in Zhejiang Province and in Sichuan Province, that the (mis)fit between the transaction attributes of land readjustment and the adopted readjustment mode greatly affects their performance. Our findings are intended to serve as a reference both for further research and for policy making on land readjustment.