Courtin and Muennig Respond to "Trials of Social Determinants".
Courtin and Muennig Respond to "Trials of Social Determinants".
复制标题
考廷和穆尼格回应“社会决定因素的审判”。
DOI:
10.1093/aje/kwac065
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
5
通讯作者:
Courtin E
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Courtin E
We thank Rojas-Saunero et al. for their commentary (1) on our article, which assessed the mental health effects of expanding the Earned Income Tax Credit for low-income Americans without dependent children in a randomized controlled trial (RCT)(2). We agree that evaluating the health effects of experimental social interventions presents challenges that extend beyond those of, for example, drug trials.As Rojas-Saunero et al. point out, follow-up was 69% at 3 years into our study (2), so we do not know how the other 31% of participants would have responded to the intervention. Provided that there is no differential attrition, it is not implausible to assume that treatment effects were observed at random. Linkages to administrative data can both fill in these gaps for trials in progress and be used to assess the long-term impacts of trials conducted in the past (3). The United States’ unique history of conducting social policy RCTs since the 1960s is actually a treasure trove for social epidemiologists interested in assessing the long-term effects of social policy interventions, and administrative data offer superior follow-up to most clinical trials. Mortality data are one example of administrative data that can be linked to older trials, providing of course that the original identifiers can be found and that the consent process allows for the linkage.