Classifying psychiatric disorders after traumatic brain injury and orthopaedic injury in children: adequacy of K-SADS versus CBCL.
Classifying psychiatric disorders after traumatic brain injury and orthopaedic injury in children: adequacy of K-SADS versus CBCL.
复制标题
儿童脑外伤和骨科损伤后精神疾病的分类：K-SADS 与 CBCL 的充分性。
DOI：
10.1080/02699050310001617325
复制
发表时间：
2004
期刊：
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Firme,Kathrina
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wassenberg,Renske;Max,JeffreyE;Koele,SharonL;Firme,Kathrina
Primary objective: To evaluate the convergence between the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (K-SADS) for the diagnosis of psychiatric disorders and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL).Research design: Cross-sectional psychiatric study of 72 children with traumatic brain injuries or orthopaedic injuries aged 5–14.Methods and procedures: Sensitivity, specificity, total predictive value and odds ratio were calculated to evaluate the association between CBCL summary scores and K-SADS diagnosis of at least one psychiatric disorder (K-SADS-1), and of CBCL subscales and K-SADS diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Lowered cut-off scores oft≥ 60 were used.Main outcomes and results: Convergence between the CBCL total problem scale and K-SADS-1 was poor. Convergence between ‘at least one elevated CBCL subscale’ and K-SADS-1, and between CBCL attention problems and social problems scales and K-SADS diagnosis of ADHD was excellent.Conclusions: Caution is needed when using the total problem scale of CBCL in predicting global psychological impairment because underestimation of problems is likely. The attention and social problems scales of CBCL can be used to estimate ADHD.
