Stakeholder Value Orientations in Water Management
Stakeholder Value Orientations in Water Management
复制标题
水管理中的利益相关者价值取向
DOI：
10.1080/08941920903496952
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
A. J. Hendriks
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Vugteveen;H. Lenders;Jeroen L. A. Devilee;Rob S. E. W. Leuven;Rob J. H. M. van der Veeren;M. A. Wiering;A. J. Hendriks
目前的水资源管理问题的特点是事实的不确定性，涉及到科学知识的局限性，价值的不确定性，涉及到决策过程中的主观选择。为综合水管理（IWM）制定和提供信息的方法需要将事实和价值结合起来。本研究探讨了价值取向的方式区别自己之间的IWM利益相关者和评估的科学支持和政策背景下的综合方法的影响。使用Q-方法，我们确定了五个方向，代表不同的方式来评价水系统及其管理的利益相关者在认知，道德和情感价值优先级。研究结果表明，科学支持，以证实水资源综合管理需要扩大到包括社会科学和偏好的政策战略的结果可能会有所不同，由于不同的方向利益攸关方之间。决策者可以从对不同价值取向的理解中受益，以解决冲突，制定规划方案并建立共识。
Current water management issues are characterized by factual uncertainty, relating to limits of scientific knowledge, and value uncertainty, relating to the policy process of making subjective choices. Developing and informing approaches for integrated water management (IWM) requires bringing facts and values together. This study examines the way value orientations differentiate themselves among IWM stakeholders and assesses implications for the scientific support and policy context of integrated approaches. Using Q-methodology, we identify five orientations that represent characteristically different ways of valuing water systems and their management by stakeholders in terms of cognitive, ethical, and affective value priorities. The findings indicate that scientific support to substantiate IWM needs to be extended to include social sciences and that preferences regarding the outcome of policy strategies may differ between stakeholders due to divergent orientations. Decision makers can benefit from the understanding of different value orientations to resolve conflicts, develop planning scenarios, and build consensus.