Contesting 'Global Sisterhood': The Global Women's Health Movement, the United Nations and the Different Meanings of Reproductive Rights (1970s-80s)

Contesting 'Global Sisterhood': The Global Women's Health Movement, the United Nations and the Different Meanings of Reproductive Rights (1970s-80s)
复制标题

争夺“全球姐妹情谊”:全球妇女健康运动、联合国和生殖权利的不同含义(1970 年代-80 年代)

DOI:
10.1111/1468-0424.12718
复制
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
影响因子:
0.5
通讯作者:
Bracke M
Bracke M
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bracke M

文献摘要

相似文献

这篇文章为1994年在开罗举行的联合国人口与发展会议和次年在北京举行的联合国妇女会议确立的生殖权利原则的全球表述谱做出了贡献。报告强调了20世纪70年代至80年代新兴的全球妇女健康运动在形成联合国关于计划生育、妇女生育选择权和妇女在社会经济发展中的作用的辩论方面所发挥的关键作用。这篇文章的重点是国际堕胎、绝育和避孕运动(1978年在伦敦测试)和妇女全球生殖权利网络(1984年在阿姆斯特丹和马尼拉;1992年获得经社理事会咨商地位)。采用交叉视角,本文强调了女权主义立场的地方嵌入性,西方女权主义的缺点,以及妇女组织之间的冲突如何使原始的和不断发展的生殖权利概念得以出现。它以联合国文件和上述组织和计划生育运动的档案为基础。
The article contributes to a genealogy of the global articulation of reproductive rights principles, as established at the 1994 United Nations (UN) Conference on Population and Development held in Cairo and the UN Women's Conference held in Beijing the following year. It highlights the key role played by an emerging global women's health movement in the 1970s–80s, in shaping UN debates on family planning, women's rights in procreative choice and women's roles in socio‐economic development. The article focuses on the International Campaign for Abortion, Sterilisation and Contraception (est. London 1978) and the Women's Global Network for Reproductive Rights (Amsterdam and Manila 1984; ECOSOC consultative status in 1992). Adopting an intersectional perspective, the paper highlights the local embeddedness of feminist positions, the shortcomings of Western feminism and the ways in which conflicts between women's organisations allowed for an original and evolving concept of reproductive rights to emerge. It is based on UN papers and the archives of the above organisations and family planning movements.