Peer Advising: A Supplement to, but not a Substitute for, Faculty Advising
Peer Advising: A Supplement to, but not a Substitute for, Faculty Advising
复制标题
同行建议：教师建议的补充，但不能替代
DOI：
10.12930/0271-9517-1.2.41
复制
发表时间：
1981
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Lois G. Goldberg
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lois G. Goldberg
1将同行顾问与专业和教师顾问进行比较：学生似乎至少对同行建议和教师建议感到满意；大学越来越多地以各种方式使用辅助专业人员；学生经常抱怨教师建议，支持使用训练有素的本科生为未申报的专业提供学术建议。我认为同行建议是对教师建议的极好补充，但不能替代。事实上，许多机构的经验证实，同行顾问的工作做得很好。但是，主要基于本科生作为学术顾问的建议系统有两个固有的问题：1)它们低估了师生互动的重要性，2)它们促进了对以下目标的有限看法
1favorably comparing peer advisors with professional and faculty advisors: that students seem at least satisfied with peer advising as with faculty advising; that colleges increasingly use paraprofessionals in various ways; and that students frequently complain about faculty advising, argues for using trained undergraduates in academic advising for undeclared majors.> I believe peer advising is an excellent supplement to, but not a substitute for, faculty advising. Indeed, experiences at many institutions confirm that peer advisors do a good job. But advising systems based primarily on undergraduates as academic advisors have two inherent problems: 1) they underestimate the importance of student-faculty interaction, and 2) they promote a limited view of the goals of