Why Diversity Matters Among Those Who Study Diversity
Why Diversity Matters Among Those Who Study Diversity
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/ae/tmaa037
复制
发表时间：
2020-09-01
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Wilson, Megan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Evangelista, Dominic A.;Goodman, Aaron;Wilson, Megan
有色人种（BIPOC）往往以致命的方式（Sinyangwe和McKesson 2020）。学术界通常认为，知识分子的活动场所在社会之外的种族方面发挥作用，因此学术界是不带偏见的;关于这一神话和学术界反黑人种族主义的讨论，见斯台普斯（1984）。然而，隐性偏见在高等学术界很常见（例如，斯台普斯1984，Pritlove et al. 2019，Eaton et al. 2020），并对BIPOC研究人员的招聘和保留产生深远影响（亚历山大和赫尔曼2016）。有几个因素影响BIPOC在进入研究生院或专业职位后在科学，技术，工程和数学（STEM）领域的保留：疏远，同事的微观和宏观侵略，获得教育的系统性不平等，以及缺乏机构支持（Salazar等人，2004年，Vasquez和Jones，2006年，Sue等人，2008年，2009年
People of Color (BIPOC) in often fatal ways (Sinyangwe and McKesson 2020). Academics often assume that intellectual venues function outside of society in terms of race and that academia is therefore unbiased; see Staples (1984) for a discussion of this myth and about anti-Black racism in academia. However, implicit biases are commonplace in higher academia (eg, Staples 1984, Pritlove et al. 2019, Eaton et al. 2020) and have a profound effect on recruitment and retention of BIPOC researchers (Alexander and Hermann 2016). Several factors influence the retention of BIPOC in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields after they enter graduate school or professional positions: alienation, micro-and macroaggressions by colleagues, systemic inequalities in access to education, and lack of institutional support (Salazar et al. 2004, Vasquez and Jones 2006, Sue et