Theorizing affective ethnography for organization studies
Theorizing affective ethnography for organization studies
复制标题
组织研究的情感民族志理论化
作者：
S. Gherardi
本文介绍了一个新的标签，“情感民族志”，并在后质化方法论和情感方法论的争论中提出。情感民族志被理论化为一种研究实践的风格，它承认所有元素-文本，演员，材料，语言，代理-已经以复杂的方式纠缠在一起，并且它们应该在它们的内部行动中被阅读，通过彼此，作为运动中的数据/移动的数据。我讨论了情感民族志的三个支柱，涉及到研究人员在做实地考察和他们的身体能力影响/被影响的存在。第一，知行合一，知行合一。做田野工作意味着与人共鸣、祝福的能力，以及情感协调的能力。第二个方面涉及作为流动的场所和过程到场所。第三个方面涉及作为行动力量的情感，因此涉及在实地工作中有意或无意地“凑合”的能力。
This article introduces a new label, ‘Affective Ethnography’, and grounds it within the debates on post-qualitative methodologies and affective methodologies. Affective ethnography is theorized as a style of research practice that acknowledges that all elements—texts, actors, materialities, language, agencies—are already entangled in complex ways, and that they should be read in their intra-actions, through one another, as data in motion/data that move. I discuss three pillars for affective ethnographies that relate to researchers’ presence in doing fieldwork and their bodily capacity to affect/be affected. The first is embodiment and embodied knowing. Doing fieldwork implies the ability to resonate with, becoming-with, and the capacity for affective attunement. The second aspect relates to place as flow, and process—to placeness. The third relates to affect as the power to act and therefore to the presence in the fieldwork of the capacity to ‘make do’, either intentionally or unintentionally.
情感理论读本
DOI：
10.1215/9780822393047-005
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Highmore B
通讯作者：
Highmore B