A comparison of conductive textile-based and silver/silver chloride gel electrodes in exercise electrocardiogram recordings

A comparison of conductive textile-based and silver/silver chloride gel electrodes in exercise electrocardiogram recordings
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2010.12.004
复制
发表时间:
2011-03-01
影响因子:
1.3
通讯作者:
Lukosevicius, Arunas
Lukosevicius, Arunas
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Marozas, Vaidotas;Petrenas, Andrius;Lukosevicius, Arunas

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景资料:本研究的目的是比较一次性银/银和可重复使用的导电织物为基础的电极在心电图(ECG)信号监测在身体activity.Materials和方法:可重复使用的电极使用薄镀银尼龙117/17 2股导电线(Statex Productions & Vertriebs GmbH,不莱梅,德国)用缝纫机缝在胸带上。根据心电信号基线漂移、宽带电极噪声特性以及电极面积对心电信号形态和频率成分的影响,对一次性电极和可重复使用电极进行了体内比较。12名志愿者被纳入本study.Results:导电织物为基础的心电图电极产生显着更多的噪声在一个非常低的频带(0-0.67 Hz)和不显着减少的宽带噪声(0-250 Hz)比一次性银/银氯化物电极。织物电极面积的减小会降低低频ECG信号的保真度。结论:织物电极具有足够的面积,可以用于比R-R间期监测更多的应用。(C)2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Background: The goal of this study was to compare disposable silver/silver chloride and reusable conductive textile-based electrodes in electrocardiogram (ECG) signal monitoring during physical activity.Materials and Methods: The reusable electrodes were produced using thin silver-plated nylon 117/17 2-ply conductive thread (Statex Productions & Vertriebs GmbH, Bremen, Germany) sewed with a sewing machine on a chest belt. The disposable and reusable electrodes were compared in vivo according to ECG signal baseline drift, broadband electrode noise properties, and influence of electrode area to ECG signal morphology and frequency content. Twelve volunteers were included in this study.Results: Electroconductive textile-based ECG electrodes produce significantly more noise in a very low frequency band (0-0.67 Hz) and not significantly less of broadband noise (0-250 Hz) than disposable silver/silver chloride electrodes. Decreasing area of textile electrodes decreases fidelity of registered ECG signals at low frequencies.Conclusion: Textile electrodes having adequate area can be used in more applications than only R-R interval monitoring. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.