A Fragile Power: Scientists and the State.

A Fragile Power: Scientists and the State.
复制标题

脆弱的力量:科学家与国家。

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1991
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
C. Mukerji
C. Mukerji
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. Lakoff;C. Mukerji

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

Andrew G.海洋物理实验室,斯克里普斯海洋研究所,拉霍亚,CA 92093-0902。应该的圣地亚哥加州大学社会学教授钱德拉·穆克吉在她最近的一本书中,将海洋学家作为软钱科学家的典范进行了研究(那些寻求政府资助以进一步研究的人,而不仅仅是那些工资依赖于这种基金的人)并得出结论,大多数科学家欺骗自己的程度,他们个人的科学自主权,科学家已经出售他们的““声音”是为了一碗浓汤。她的讨论集中在两个看似不同的项目上:由美国资助的研究。S.能源部表面上是为了检查海洋是否适合作为核废料的处置场所,以及由国家科学基金会资助的研究海底热液喷口的考察。她用这些作为案例研究来考察科学家和国家之间的关系,并认为过于简单化的功利主义概念,
Andrew G. Dick,,,on. Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92093-0902. should. In her recent book, Chandra Mukerji, professor of Sociology at the University of California, San Diego, studies oceanographers as paradigms of soft-money scientists at large (those who seek government funds to further their research, not solely those whose salary depends on such funds) and concludes that most scientists delude themselves as to the extent of their individual scientific aut o n o m y t h a t scientists have sold their "voice" for a mess of pottage. Her discussion focuses detailed attention on two seemingly different programs: research funded by the U. S. Department of Energy ostensibly to examine the suitability of the oceans as a site for the disposal of nuclear waste and expeditions funded by the National Science Foundation to study submarine hydrothermal vents. She uses these as case studies to examine the relationship between scientist and state and dismisses as oversimplified the utilitarian concept that