Early pottery mobility: The case of early Neolithic Thessaly, Greece
Early pottery mobility: The case of early Neolithic Thessaly, Greece
复制标题
早期陶器的流动性：以希腊新石器时代早期色萨利为例
DOI：
10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.01.008
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Dimoula
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Dimoula
希腊最早的陶瓷器皿已经在考古层中被确定为新石器时代初期，即公元前7千年中期，在希腊中北部的色萨利（Reingruber，2008），伯罗奔尼撒半岛的Franchthi洞穴（Vitelli，1993 b）和克里特岛的Knossos（Tomkins和Day，2001，Tomkins等人，2004年）。最近在希腊北方，特别是马其顿地区的考古实地研究，揭示了一系列新的新石器时代早期遗址，这些遗址产生了日期和背景的早期陶器，目前正在分析（Kotsakis，2014年，Maniatis，2014年，Dimoula，出版中，Saridaki等人，在旧石器时代或中石器时代的背景下，烤粘土块甚至陶瓷碎片的存在表明，希腊早期居民并不陌生陶瓷材料（Galanidou和Perlès，2003）。然而，在随后的新石器时代早期，陶器作为一种完全发展的工艺出现，其特点是在制造的各个阶段都有有效的技术选择（Vitelli，1995）。此外，完全缺乏与这种创新技术的可能实验有关的证据。这导致了一种假设，即陶器技术是所谓的“新石器时代包”的一部分，这是一种材料，技术和知识的积累，据信通过流行或文化传播从近东转移到爱琴海和巴尔干半岛（Ammerman和Biagi，2003）。在这种情况下，在整个广泛的地理区域的花盆的共同形态特征被认为是这种过程的证据（Brami和Heyd，2011年）。
The earliest ceramic vessels in Greece have been identified in archaeological layers dated to the initial Neolithic, ie the mid-7th millennium BCE, in a series of Neolithic sites in Thessaly (Reingruber, 2008) in central-northern Greece, in the cave of Franchthi in the Peloponnese (Vitelli, 1993b) and in Knossos in Crete (Tomkins and Day, 2001, Tomkins et al., 2004). Recent archaeological field research in northern Greece, and particularly in the region of Macedonia, has brought to light a new series of early Neolithic sites which have yielded dated and contextualized early pottery, currently analysed (Kotsakis, 2014, Maniatis, 2014, Dimoula, in press, Saridaki et al., in press)(Fig. 1).The presence of baked clay masses or even ceramic sherds in Paleolithic or Mesolithic contexts indicate that ceramic materials were not unknown to the earlier inhabitants of Greece (Galanidou and Perlès, 2003). However, in the subsequent early Neolithic period pottery appears as a fully developed craft, characterized by effective technological choices in all stages of manufacture (Vitelli, 1995). Moreover, there is a complete lack of evidence related to possible experimentations with this innovative then technique. This has led to the assumption that pottery technology was part of the so-called ‘Neolithic package’, an accumulation of materials, techniques and knowledge, believed to have transferred from the Near East to the Aegean and the Balkans through demic or cultural diffusion (Ammerman and Biagi, 2003). In this context, the common morphological characteristics of pots throughout broad geographic regions are considered as evidence of such processes (Brami and Heyd, 2011).