Building a collaborative Psychological Science: Lessons learned from ManyBabies 1.

Building a collaborative Psychological Science: Lessons learned from ManyBabies 1.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/cap0000216
复制
发表时间:
2020-11
期刊:
Canadian psychology = Psychologie canadienne
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Soderstrom M
Soderstrom M
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Byers-Heinlein K;Bergmann C;Davies C;Frank MC;Hamlin JK;Kline M;Kominsky JF;Kosie JE;Lew-Williams C;Liu L;Mastroberardino M;Singh L;Waddell CPG;Zettersten M;Soderstrom M

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

婴儿研究领域面临着一项艰巨的挑战:有些问题需要的样本太大,任何一个实验室都无法招募和测试。 ManyBabies 旨在通过就发展科学的关键理论问题开展大规模合作来解决这个问题,同时促进开放科学实践的采用。在这里,我们回顾一下 ManyBabies 旗下完成的第一个项目——ManyBabies 1——它测试了婴儿导向言语偏好的发展。我们的目标是分享项目过程中吸取的经验教训,并阐明我们对该领域大规模合作的作用的愿景。首先,我们考虑在扩大实验研究规模方面做出的决定,以进行涉及 100 多名研究人员和 70 多个实验室的合作。接下来,我们讨论项目过程中的成功和挑战,包括:协议设计和实施、数据分析、组织结构和协作工作流程、确保资金以及鼓励广泛参与项目。最后,我们讨论了我们在正在进行的 ManyBabies 项目和未来大规模合作中看到的好处,特别关注开发最佳实践以及增加婴儿研究和心理科学的增长和多样性。在整篇论文中,我们都包含第一手的叙述经验,以说明在项目中扮演不同角色的研究人员的观点。虽然该项目专注于婴儿研究的独特挑战,但我们获得的许多见解可以应用于更广泛的心理学领域的大规模合作。
The field of infancy research faces a difficult challenge: some questions require samples that are simply too large for any one lab to recruit and test. ManyBabies aims to address this problem by forming large-scale collaborations on key theoretical questions in developmental science, while promoting the uptake of Open Science practices. Here, we look back on the first project completed under the ManyBabies umbrella – ManyBabies 1 – which tested the development of infant-directed speech preference. Our goal is to share the lessons learned over the course of the project and to articulate our vision for the role of large-scale collaborations in the field. First, we consider the decisions made in scaling up experimental research for a collaboration involving 100+ researchers and 70+ labs. Next, we discuss successes and challenges over the course of the project, including: protocol design and implementation, data analysis, organizational structures and collaborative workflows, securing funding, and encouraging broad participation in the project. Finally, we discuss the benefits we see both in ongoing ManyBabies projects and in future large-scale collaborations in general, with a particular eye towards developing best practices and increasing growth and diversity in infancy research and psychological science in general. Throughout the paper, we include first-hand narrative experiences, in order to illustrate the perspectives of researchers playing different roles within the project. While this project focused on the unique challenges of infant research, many of the insights we gained can be applied to large-scale collaborations across the broader field of psychology.
DOI: 10.1177/2515245918797607
发表时间: 2018-12-01
影响因子: 13.6
作者:
Moshontz, Hannah;Campbell, Lorne;Chartier, Christopher R.
通讯作者: Chartier, Christopher R.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012
发表时间: 2016-11-01
影响因子: 3.5
作者:
Ebersole, Charles R.;Atherton, Olivia E.;Nosek, Brian A.
通讯作者: Nosek, Brian A.
DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000178
发表时间: 2014-01-01
期刊: SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
影响因子: 1.8
作者:
Klein, Richard A.;Ratliff, Kate A.;Nosek, Brian A.
通讯作者: Nosek, Brian A.
DOI: 10.1177/0956797611417632
发表时间: 2011-11-01
影响因子: 8.2
作者:
Simmons, Joseph P.;Nelson, Leif D.;Simonsohn, Uri
通讯作者: Simonsohn, Uri
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.017
发表时间: 2017-10-01
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
Nielsen, Mark;Haun, Daniel;Legare, Cristine H.
通讯作者: Legare, Cristine H.