The Q61H mutation decouples KRAS from upstream regulation and renders cancer cells resistant to SHP2 inhibitors.
The Q61H mutation decouples KRAS from upstream regulation and renders cancer cells resistant to SHP2 inhibitors.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1038/s41467-021-26526-y
复制
发表时间:
2021-11-01
影响因子:
16.6
通讯作者:
Ikura M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gebregiworgis T;Kano Y;St-Germain J;Radulovich N;Udaskin ML;Mentes A;Huang R;Poon BPK;He W;Valencia-Sama I;Robinson CM;Huestis M;Miao J;Yeh JJ;Zhang ZY;Irwin MS;Lee JE;Tsao MS;Raught B;Marshall CB;Ohh M;Ikura M
Cancer cells bearing distinct KRAS mutations exhibit variable sensitivity to SHP2 inhibitors (SHP2i). Here we show that cells harboring KRAS Q61H are uniquely resistant to SHP2i, and investigate the underlying mechanisms using biophysics, molecular dynamics, and cell-based approaches. Q61H mutation impairs intrinsic and GAP-mediated GTP hydrolysis, and impedes activation by SOS1, but does not alter tyrosyl phosphorylation. Wild-type and Q61H-mutant KRAS are both phosphorylated by Src on Tyr32 and Tyr64 and dephosphorylated by SHP2, however, SHP2i does not reduce ERK phosphorylation in KRAS Q61H cells. Phosphorylation of wild-type and Gly12-mutant KRAS, which are associated with sensitivity to SHP2i, confers resistance to regulation by GAP and GEF activities and impairs binding to RAF, whereas the near-complete GAP/GEF-resistance of KRAS Q61H remains unaltered, and high-affinity RAF interaction is retained. SHP2 can stimulate KRAS signaling by modulating GEF/GAP activities and dephosphorylating KRAS, processes that fail to regulate signaling of the Q61H mutant. SHP2 promotes RAS-driven MAPK signalling, but it is unclear why cancer cells with distinct KRAS mutations exhibit differential sensitivity to SHP2 inhibition. Here the authors show that KRAS Q61H is decoupled from SHP2- mediated upstream regulation, thus Q61H pancreatic cancer cells maintain MAPK signalling and are refractory to SHP2 inhibitors.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
82.9
作者:
Dardaei L;Wang HQ;Singh M;Fordjour P;Shaw KX;Yoda S;Kerr G;Yu K;Liang J;Cao Y;Chen Y;Lawrence MS;Langenbucher A;Gainor JF;Friboulet L;Dagogo-Jack I;Myers DT;Labrot E;Ruddy D;Parks M;Lee D;DiCecca RH;Moody S;Hao H;Mohseni M;LaMarche M;Williams J;Hoffmaster K;Caponigro G;Shaw AT;Hata AN;Benes CH;Li F;Engelman JA
通讯作者:
Engelman JA
影响因子:
28.2
作者:
Fedele C;Ran H;Diskin B;Wei W;Jen J;Geer MJ;Araki K;Ozerdem U;Simeone DM;Miller G;Neel BG;Tang KH
通讯作者:
Tang KH
影响因子:
16.6
作者:
Chabon JJ;Simmons AD;Lovejoy AF;Esfahani MS;Newman AM;Haringsma HJ;Kurtz DM;Stehr H;Scherer F;Karlovich CA;Harding TC;Durkin KA;Otterson GA;Purcell WT;Camidge DR;Goldman JW;Sequist LV;Piotrowska Z;Wakelee HA;Neal JW;Alizadeh AA;Diehn M
通讯作者:
Diehn M
影响因子:
3.6
作者:
Bournet B;Muscari F;Buscail C;Assenat E;Barthet M;Hammel P;Selves J;Guimbaud R;Cordelier P;Buscail L
通讯作者:
Buscail L
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Ahmed, Tamer A.;Adamopoulos, Christos;Poulikakos, Poulikos I.
通讯作者:
Poulikakos, Poulikos I.