The influence of bioRχiv on PLOS ONE's peer‐review and acceptance time
The influence of bioRχiv on PLOS ONE's peer‐review and acceptance time
复制标题
bioRχiv 对 PLOS ONE 同行评审和录用时间的影响
DOI：
10.1002/pra2.398
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Amano Kou
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tsunoda Hiroyuki;Sun Yuan;Nishizawa Masaki;Liu Xiaomin;Amano Kou
本研究探讨预印本出版与期刊出版接受时间的关系。具体来说，我们调查了论文在预印本服务器bioR χ iv上的发布时间与期刊文章的同行评审和PLOS ONE接受时间之间的关联。截至目前，在1,626种学术期刊上发表的论文中，bioR χ iv的平均发表率为40.67%。与此同时，PLOS ONE是发表论文最多的期刊。对通过预印本发表在期刊上的论文的同行评审和接受时间的分析表明，这些论文的发布时间与这些时间间隔有关。期刊提交日期晚于首次发布到bioR χ iv日期的同行评审和接受时间的中位数为110.00天，反之为139.50天。在期刊提交之前发布到预印本服务器比相反显示更好的顺序。这项研究使我们对同行评议过程有了很好的理解。它还为我们优化这一过程提供了很好的见解，这将促进论文出版和知识传播。
This study examines the relation between acceptance times in preprint publishing and journal publishing. Specifically, we investigated the association between a paper's posting time to bioRχiv, a preprints server, and journal articles' peer‐review and acceptance time forPLOS ONE. So far, of the total papers published in 1,626 academic journals, the average publication rate of those posted in bioRχiv is 40.67%. Meanwhile,PLOS ONEwas the journal that published more papers. Analysis of peer‐review and acceptance time of papers published in journals via preprints showed the time these papers are posted in relation to these intervals. The median of the peer‐review and acceptance time of the journal submission date that was later than the date of first posting to bioRχiv was 110.00 days, and in the reverse case, it was 139.50 days. Posting to the preprint server before journal submission shows a better order than vice versa. This study provides us a good understanding of the peer‐review process. It also gives us good insights into optimizing this process, which would then facilitate paper publication and knowledge dissemination.