On the Scope and Typology of 'Research Misconduct': The Gaze of the General Medical Council, 1990-2015.
On the Scope and Typology of 'Research Misconduct': The Gaze of the General Medical Council, 1990-2015.
复制标题
论“研究不端行为”的范围和类型：医学总会的目光，1990-2015 年。
DOI：
10.1093/medlaw/fww019
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Jacob MA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jacob MA
违反研究诚信被认为对科学的可信度和公众健康产生广泛的负面影响。我写这篇文章的目的不是为了引起对研究不端行为的进一步愤怒。相反，这篇文章质疑研究行为明确通过特定监管机构的眼睛和特定时期（1990-2015）。其结果是一个评估的优势和局限性的应用一般医学理事会的（GMC的）健身实践模式在这一领域。它提供了一个机会，将分析的注意力转移到现有的研究不端行为的类型学-经典的捏造，伪造和剽窃或FFP-指出其不足之处，并想象它如何根据实践案例工作的适应性告诉我们关于医疗从业者犯下的具体，特定背景的研究不端行为的实例。在文献中，既没有一个系统的研究行为，因为他们得到逮捕时，他们这样做，通过透镜的英国医学专业监管机构，也没有一个基于案例的反思，现有的框架和类型学在科学界使用的充分描述的做法，医学研究不端行为。本文旨在填补这两个空白。
Violations of research integrity are understood to have wide-ranging negative consequences for the trustworthiness of science and the health of the public. My goal in this article is not to cause further outrage about research misconduct. Instead, this article queries research conducts expressly as seen through the eyes of a specific regulator and over a specific period (1990–2015). The result is an assessment of the strengths and limitations of the application of the General Medical Council’s (GMC’s) fitness to practice model in this area. It provides with an opportunity to shift the analytical attention back onto the existing typology of research misconduct—the classic Fabrication, Falsification, and Plagiarism or FFP—point to its deficiencies, and imagine how it could be refined in light of what the fitness to practice casework tells us about concrete, context-specific instances of research misconduct committed by medical practitioners. In the literature, there has been neither a systematic examination of research behaviours as they get apprehended—when they do—through the lens of the British medical professional regulator, nor a case-based reflection on whether the existing frameworks and typologies used in the scientific community describe adequately the practices of medical research misconduct. The article aims to fill these two gaps.