Finite type link invariants of 3-manifolds
Finite type link invariants of 3-manifolds
复制标题
3-流形的有限类型链接不变量
DOI:
10.1016/0040-9383(94)90034-5
复制
发表时间:
1994
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Xiaoxia Lin
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Xiaoxia Lin
SINCE the discovery of the Jones polynomial and its generalizations(see [6, lo], for example), it is always tempting to try to understand their relations with the topology of knots and links. As the original definition of these link invariants depends in a fundamental way on the projections of links in the 3-space, this is certainly not an easy task. Therefore, the first step should be to find a definition for these Jones-type link invariants independent of the special features of the 3-space and thus to capture the underlying topology of these link invariants. In other words, we would like to have an intrinsic definition of Jones-type link invariants so that it can be applied to 3-manifolds other than the 3-space subject only to some topological restrictions.Witten’s definition of Jones-type invariants [13] in terms of Chern-Simons path integrals could certainly be thought of as such an intrinsic definition. In spite of the fact that path integrals are not rigorously defined, the lesson we drew from the perturbation theory of Chern-Simons path integrals [l, 21 is that we should rather think of Jones-type link invariants as formal power series where only the coefficients might be well-defined geometrically or topologically. There is no reason a prior for the convergence of these formal power series. Some of these formal power series converge to things like HOMFLY and Kauffman polynomials in the 3-space because they satisfy certain crossing change formulae and crossing changes reduce the complexity of links in the 3-space. Nevertheless, as the coefficients of the power series expansions of Chern-Simons path integrals in the perturbation theory are expressed as singular integrations over certain finite dimensional auxiliary manifolds, there are problems like the convergence of these singular integrations and the independence of these singular integrations from the choice of metrics, etc. Moreover, it is not clear what kind of topological information we can obtain from these singular integrations.