Narratives and Evaluation: How to Write Competitive NSF CS Education Proposals
Narratives and Evaluation: How to Write Competitive NSF CS Education Proposals
复制标题
叙述和评估：如何撰写有竞争力的 NSF CS 教育提案
DOI：
10.1145/3287324.3287531
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Sitaraman, Murali
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
August, Stephanie E.;Che, S. Megan;Kraemer, Eileen T.;Pauley, Mark;Sitaraman, Murali
你制定一个计划，在你的班级或跨机构测试新学习策略的原型。你如何确保你的计划被评审者和管理NSF计划的官员清楚地理解？当一个提案被提交后，评审者的脑海中会想到什么？是什么促使一项提案被推荐获得资助，而另一项提案却被拒绝？对小组审查过程的仔细检查可以为提案写作提供信息，并确保审查人员理解一个想法，确定其优点，并重视PI对工作如何扩大STEM教育参与的愿景。该研讨会通过NSF提案审查过程，从提交提案到授予或拒绝，触及NSF的知识价值和更广泛的影响标准，将项目管道映射到适当的评估。参与者深入了解如何写好评论并提高自己的提案写作。欲了解更多信息和差旅支持，请访问：https://people.cs.clemson.edu/~etkraem/UPCSEd/。推荐的笔记本电脑。
You develop a plan for testing the prototype for a new learning strategy in your class or across institutions. How can you ensure that your plan is clearly understood by reviewers and the managing NSF program officer? What goes through the reviewer's mind once a proposal is submitted? What prompts one proposal to be recommended for funding but another declined? Close examination of the panel review process can inform proposal writing and ensure that reviewers will understand an idea, identify its merit, and value a PI's vision of how the work will broaden participation in STEM education. This workshop steps through the NSF proposal review process from submission of proposal to award or decline, touching on NSF intellectual merit and broader impact criteria, mapping the project pipeline to appropriate evaluation. Participants gain insight into writing a good review and improving one's own proposal writing. For further information and travel support see: https://people.cs.clemson.edu/~etkraem/UPCSEd/. Laptops recommended.