SELECTIVITY OF TOWED-NET SAMPLERS
SELECTIVITY OF TOWED-NET SAMPLERS
复制标题
拖网采样器的选择性
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1972
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
R. Barkley
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Barkley
ABSTRACf The ideal sampler for plankton and nekton is one whose selective characteristics are known to be appropriate to any given problem, so that it catches the right organisms, and rejects others, with known efficiency. This paper presents a quantitative theoretical analysis of one aspect of selectivity, avoidance of towed-net samplers. The theory is evaluated against three sets of paired samples obtained by different nets at different speeds to provide absolute and relative tests of its validity. A single sample obtained by one net towed at one speed is then analyzed to illustrate the procedure. Final eval uation of the theory awaits studies of animal behavior when confronted by a sampler, but the theory provides informative and· reasonable interpretations of plankton and nekton catch data, particularly estimates of population abundance and mesh losses, even when behavior of the animals is not known. An ideal sampler for plankton and nekton must meet,at least two requirements, one qual itative and the other quantitative: It must col lect or detect certain components of these ex tremely diverse communities, while rejecting most others; and it must do this with known effectiveness. For some purposes the qualitative aspects of sampler selectivity are relatively more important than the quantitative ones, or vice versa, but neither can ever be completely ignored in the design and selection of sampling gear. Sampler selectivity has usually been evaluated empirically, by comparing results obtained with one sampler under different conditions or by in tercomparing various sampling methods. The plankton purse seine developed by Murphy and Clutter (1972) appears to be nearly ideal for the latter purpose. It is relatively nonselective for a wide spectrum of organism types and sizes, making it useful as a "primary standard" for calibrating more selective gear, as Murphy and Clutter demonstrate. A sound theory of sampler selectivity would be of great value as a guide to the collection and analysis of empirical data, but relatively little effort has been devoted to the development of such theory (Tranter, 1968). What I propose