BIM: innovation in design management, influence and challenges of implementation
BIM: innovation in design management, influence and challenges of implementation
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/17452007.2013.821399
复制
发表时间：
2014-05
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
A. Elmualim;J. Gilder
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Elmualim;J. Gilder
建筑业被广泛批评为一个分散的行业。越来越多的人呼吁该行业进行改革。所倡导的变革要求在设计、施工和整个供应链的过程中进行协作和创新。创新和新兴技术的应用被视为整合流程的推动力，如建筑信息建模（BIM）。进行了问卷调查，以确定在设计管理，创新和BIM应用方面的建筑变化，作为协作的前沿途径。调查的受访者来自整个建筑行业的一系列指定，如建筑经理，设计师，工程师，设计协调员，设计经理，建筑师，建筑技术专家和测量师。大多数受访者普遍认为，设计团队负责其组织的设计管理。有一种观点认为，设计经理和客户是推动创新的催化剂。目前行业在整合BIM技术方面的现状既提出了挑战，也提供了实现目标的机会。BIM技术为建筑物的设计、建造和维护提供了一种新的范式转变。这种模式的转变要求重新思考教育建筑专业人员的课程，集体。
The construction industry is widely being criticised as a fragmented industry. There are mounting calls for the industry to change. The espoused change calls for collaboration as well as embracing innovation in the process of design, construction and across the supply chain. Innovation and the application of emerging technologies are seen as enablers for integrating the processes ‘integrating the team’ such as building information modelling (BIM). A questionnaire survey was conducted to ascertain change in construction with regard to design management, innovation and the application of BIM as cutting edge pathways for collaboration. The respondents to the survey were from an array of designations across the construction industry such as construction managers, designers, engineers, design coordinators, design managers, architects, architectural technologists and surveyors. There was a general agreement by most respondents that the design team was responsible for design management in their organisation. There is a perception that the design manager and the client are the catalyst for advancing innovation. The current state of industry in terms of incorporating BIM technologies is posing a challenge as well as providing an opportunity for accomplishment. BIM technologies provide a new paradigm shift in the way buildings are designed, constructed and maintained. This paradigm shift calls for rethinking the curriculum for educating building professionals, collectively.