Criteria and Evaluation for Ontology Modularization Techniques
Criteria and Evaluation for Ontology Modularization Techniques
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/978-3-642-01907-4_4
复制
发表时间：
2009-05
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Mathieu d’Aquin;Anne Schlicht;H. Stuckenschmidt;M. Sabou
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mathieu d’Aquin;Anne Schlicht;H. Stuckenschmidt;M. Sabou
虽然许多作者都主张将模块化原则应用于本体论的好处，但对于模块如何定义以及它们应该具有什么属性还没有共同的理解。在上一节中，我们从纯粹逻辑的角度讨论了这个问题。在本章中，我们将从更广泛的角度来看待可以用来确定模块质量的可能标准。这些标准包括基于逻辑的，但也有结构和应用程序相关的标准，有时借用相关领域，如软件工程。我们给出了一个可能的标准的概述，并确定缺乏应用程序依赖的质量措施。我们进一步报告了一些模块化实验，并讨论了在这些实验的背景下，质量标准和评价的作用。
While many authors have argued for the benefits of applying principles of modularization to ontologies, there is not yet a common understanding of how modules are defined and what properties they should have. In the previous section, this question was addressed from a purely logical point of view. In this chapter, we take a broader view on possible criteria that can be used to determine the quality of a modules. Such criteria include logic-based, but also structural and application-dependent criteria, sometimes borrowing from related fields such as software engineering. We give an overview of possible criteria and identify a lack of application-dependent quality measures. We further report some modularization experiments and discuss the role of quality criteria and evaluation in the context of these experiments.