Research Ethics in Correspondence Testing: An Update

Research Ethics in Correspondence Testing: An Update
复制标题

函授测试中的研究伦理:更新

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
影响因子:
1.7
通讯作者:
Eva Zschirnt
Eva Zschirnt
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Eva Zschirnt

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

通过对应测试来研究市场上的歧视已经变得很普遍,互联网应用程序的使用使研究人员能够发送更多的应用程序。虽然研究伦理的问题总是出现在计划一个对应测试,这个问题得到相对较少的关注,在出版的对应测试。本文讨论了在互联网时代,函授考试中的伦理问题。它侧重于在通信测试中出现的道德问题,寻找潜在的问题(关于自愿参与,知情同意,欺骗,诱捕雇主,雇主的权利)和可能的解决方案,以及技术挑战。欧洲国家的例子表明,在通信测试中提出的道德问题必须根据国家情况重新谈判。本文认为,通信测试,如果精心策划和负责任地执行,可以满足大多数社会科学伦理准则的道德要求。
Correspondence testing to research discrimination in the marketplace has become common and the use of internet applications has allowed researchers to send greater numbers of applications. While questions of research ethics always arise when planning a correspondence test, the issue receives relatively little attention in published correspondence tests. This paper addresses the question of ethics in correspondence testing in the age of ready internet access. It focusses on the ethical issues that arise in correspondence testing, looking at potential problems (regarding voluntary participation, informed consent, deception, entrapment of employers, employers’ rights) and possible solutions, and technical challenges. European country examples show that the ethical questions raised in correspondence testing have to be renegotiated depending on the national context. The paper argues that correspondence testing, if planned carefully and executed responsibly, can meet most of the ethical requirements of Social Science ethics guidelines.
识别工作中的歧视:使用现场实验。
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01746.x
发表时间: 2012
期刊: The Journal of social issues
影响因子: --
作者:
Pager,Devah;Western,Bruce
通讯作者: Western,Bruce