Comparison of BEM-CFD and full rotor geometry simulations for the performance and flow field of a marine current turbine
Comparison of BEM-CFD and full rotor geometry simulations for the performance and flow field of a marine current turbine
复制标题
BEM-CFD 与全转子几何模拟对海流涡轮机性能和流场的比较
DOI:
10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.047
复制
发表时间:
2015-03
期刊:
影响因子:
8.7
通讯作者:
Zhengwei Wang
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Qiang Guo;Lingjiu Zhou;Zhengwei Wang
Recent studies have coupled blade element momentum (BEM) theory with the Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes equations in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software, as the BEM-CFD method to analyse the flows in marine current turbines is with much less computational resources. The accuracy of the BEM-CFD calculation was evaluated by analysing the performance and flow field characteristics of an isolated horizontal axis marine current turbine with comparisons to a full rotor geometry simulation and experimental data. The comparisons show that the full rotor geometry simulation gives good predictions near the optimal conditions (TSR = 5–7), but is less accurate for off-design conditions. The BEM-CFD results, which are based on two-dimensional hydrofoil theory, are evaluated using the experimental and numerical lift and drag coefficients. It shows that the two-dimensional lift and drag coefficients had significant effects on the BEM-CFD predictions. Overall, the BEM-CFD based on the numerical hydrofoil data can accurately predict the thrust, but generally overestimates the power. The influence of the lift and drag terms on the BEM-CFD predictions suggest that more reasonable 2D predictions for hydrofoils and the 3D effects should be considered to improve the BEM-CFD accuracy. BEM-CFD can reasonably reflect the circumferential averaged velocity characteristics near the rotor for the optimal condition (TSR = 6) and gets symmetrical features in the wake, but it cannot predict the detailed flow features caused by the finite number of blades due to the limitations of the BEM-CFD method.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
8.7
作者:
Guanghui Bai;Jun Li;Pengfei Fan;Guojun Li
通讯作者:
Guanghui Bai;Jun Li;Pengfei Fan;Guojun Li
DOI:
10.1109/oceans.2010.5664564
发表时间:
2010-12
期刊:
OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE
影响因子:
--
作者:
M. Harrison;W. Batten;A. Bahaj
通讯作者:
M. Harrison;W. Batten;A. Bahaj
DOI:
10.1098/rsta.2012.0293
发表时间:
2013-02
期刊:
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
影响因子:
--
作者:
W. Batten;M. Harrison;A. Bahaj
通讯作者:
W. Batten;M. Harrison;A. Bahaj
影响因子:
3.2
作者:
T. Y. Chen;L. Liou
通讯作者:
T. Y. Chen;L. Liou
DOI:
10.5860/choice.49-2091
发表时间:
2001-11
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
作者:
T. Burton;D. Sharpe;E. Bossanyi;N. Jenkins
通讯作者:
T. Burton;D. Sharpe;E. Bossanyi;N. Jenkins