The problem of peace: understanding the ‘liberal peace’
The problem of peace: understanding the ‘liberal peace’
复制标题
和平问题：理解“自由和平”
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Oliver P. Richmond
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Oliver P. Richmond
记住广岛就是致力于和平。教皇约翰·保罗二世，1 1981年和平是不可战胜的美德横行。归于G. K。切斯特顿本文探讨了自由和平的发展，确定其内部组成部分和经常被忽视的紧张关系。在冲突后环境中建设自由和平及其相关的论述和做法远非连贯一致。它在理论和实践上都存在严重缺陷，尤其是它把政治、社会和经济改革作为主要依赖于治理改革的长期体制进程。因此，它忽视了一些临时性问题，如民间社会行为者的性质、机构和需求，特别是与结束战争经济有关的问题，以及用符合个人社会和经济需求以及政治需求的框架来取代这些问题。因此，由此产生的和平往往是非常脆弱的，充其量是“虚拟的”，而不是解放。
To remember Hiroshima is to commit oneself to peace. Pope John Paul II, 1 1981 Pax Invictis2 Virtue runs amok. Attributed to G.K. Chesterton This essay examines the development of the liberal peace, identifying its internal components and the often-ignored tensions between them. The construction of the liberal peace, and its associated discourses and practices in post-conflict environments is far from coherent. It is subject to significant intellectual and practical shortcomings, not least related to its focus on political, social, and economic reforms as mainly long-term institutional processes resting on the reform of governance. It thereby neglects interim issues such as the character, agency and needs of civil society actors, especially related to the ending of war economies, and their replacement with frameworks that respond to individual social and economic needs, as well as political needs. The resultant peace is therefore often very flimsy and at best ‘virtual’, rather than emancipatory.