Erratum to: Social Inclusion Enhances Biological Motion Processing: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study.
Erratum to: Social Inclusion Enhances Biological Motion Processing: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study.
复制标题
勘误：社会包容增强生物运动处理：功能性近红外光谱研究。
DOI：
10.1007/s10548-014-0419-x
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Kaiser,MarthaD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bolling,DanielleZ;Pelphrey,KevinA;Kaiser,MarthaD
在我们继续使用本文所述研究中使用的分析包时，我们发现了协议计时自动检测中的一个错误。协议定时的自动检测用于生成我们的一般线性模型（GLM）的任务预测器。程序不是将数据中的标记阅读为实验块的起始和偏移，每个实验块持续20 s以上，而是将每个标记读取为瞬时事件的离散起始。我们验证了此错误在所有参与者中是一致的。为了纠正这个错误，我们用GLM任务预测器的正确时间手动重新处理了所有数据。这影响了两个图中所示的结果，导致对图进行了校正。此外，作者继续在我们的结果部分，我们描述了图1和图2中描绘的活性区域。2和3如图2所示，我们最初发现右缘上回是对生物学[杂乱]运动有强烈反应的单一区域，在实验条件下会崩溃。在修正后的结果中，唯一显示出这种效应的区域是颞叶下皮层（在我们的功能磁共振成像比较结果中也有这个区域）。如图3所示，在社会包容之后，报告的右背外侧前额叶皮层的影响并没有保留在校正的结果中。图1和图2的所有其他文本描述2和3仍然是正确的更正。我们还描述了GLM分析的结果，没有在任何图中示出。在这些结果中，仅在右侧小脑的一个非常小的区域中，与基线相比，纳入后对生物运动与杂乱运动的脑反应增加。与基线相比，中央前回和右侧小脑延伸到颞下皮层的区域显示出对排除后生物（与混杂）运动的激活减少。图4所示的数据（ROI分析）不是使用GLM生成的，因此不受错误的影响。然而，在我们对数据的彻底重新评估中，我们注意到在我们的重复测量ANOVA中误报了自由度。对于“结果：投资回报率分析”中报告的前三个方差分析，自由度应为（2，22）而不是（10，2）。对于后两个ANOVA，自由度应为（1，11）而不是（11，1）。
In our continued use of the analysis package employed in the study presented in this paper, we discovered an error in the automated detection of our protocol timing. The automated detection of protocol timing was used to generate task predictors for our general linear models (GLMs). Instead of reading marks in the data as onsets and offsets of experimental blocks lasting over 20 s each, the program read each mark as a discrete onset of an instantaneous event. We verified this error was consistent among all participants. To correct this error, we manually reprocessed all of our data with the correct timing of our GLM task predictors. This affected the results presented in the two figures, leading to the corrected figures. Moreover, the authors continue, in our results section, we described the active regions depicted in Figs. 2 and 3. Illustrated in Fig. 2, we originally found right supramarginal gyrus as the single region showing a robust response to biological [scrambled motion collapsed across experimental conditions. In the corrected results, the sole region showing this effect is inferior temporal cortex (a region also represented in our comparative fMRI results). Illustrated in Fig. 3, following social inclusion, the reported effect in right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex did not remain in the corrected results. All other text descriptions of Figs. 2 and 3 remain true with the correction. We also describe results of GLM analyses not illustrated in any figures. Of these results, brain responses to biological versus scrambled motion increased postinclusion compared to baseline only in a very small region of right cerebellum. Regions of precentral gyrus and right cerebellum extending into inferior temporal cortex showed decreased activation to biological (vs. scrambled) motion post-exclusion compared to baseline. All other text descriptions of non-illustrated data remain true with the correction.Data presented in Fig. 4 (ROI analyses) was not generated using a GLM, and thus was not affected by the error. However, in our thorough re-evaluation of the data, we noted that the degrees of freedom were misreported in our repeated measures ANOVAs. For the first three ANOVAs reported in ‘‘Results: ROI Analyses’’, the degrees of freedom should be (2, 22) instead of (10, 2). For the second two ANOVAs, the degrees of freedom should be (1, 11) instead of (11, 1).